TESTING TINA
WANDERING
The library only helps if you go looking. When there’s time, you can move through a script in order, ticking neat little boxes. When there isn’t, you have to wander — clicking like a curious stranger, taking the wrong turn on purpose, asking what someone might do here that no one wrote down. Wandering looks like inefficiency from the outside. It is, in fact, often the only way to find the bugs no one thought to predict. Scripts find what you already feared. Wandering finds what was waiting.
HOW THIS COULD LOOK IN PRACTICE
Try this once, and you'll never go back. Last Friday, I had thirty minutes left and a clean test report, and instead of closing the laptop, I opened the product in a fresh browser as a brand new user, made the window awkwardly narrow, and started doing small, unreasonable things. Hit back from the welcome modal. Refreshed in the middle of onboarding. Opened the same setup page in two tabs and worked in both. Three bugs surfaced in fifteen minutes, and not one of them lived anywhere in the test plan. The script would have ended the day with a green checkmark. The wandering ended with a much better release.
CLICK REPLY ON THIS EMAIL TO SHARE YOUR STORY
MORE TESTING RESOURCES
Until next time,
Tina
100% AI content for a testing environment